UX-LX: Talks on Digital Harm and Understanding Searcher Behavior

User Experience Lisbon 2023

In May, I was invited to speak at UX Lisbon, on Preventing Digital Harm in Online Spaces. At the main event, I presented the Internet Safety Lab’s framework for evaluating the relationship that digital technologies have with consumers and what we can do as designers to mitigate the digital harms and dark patterns that could potentially violate that relationship. You can download my presentation below.

On the first day of the event, I ran a half-day, pre-conference workshop titled “Designing Effective Search Strategies” in which I introduced a new framework using observation as a powerful tool to understand site search behavior. To explore this, we broke into seven groups and worked on creating empathy maps, search personas (including group personas) and mapping the user journey toward information discovery. As a takeaway, all participants received a toolkit for crafting these artifacts and a step-by-step process to enhance product search. We got to eat yummy Portuguese snacks, too!

“Noreen … made the interesting point that if we build an accessible design we’ll also be solving many search problems.”

UXLx: UX Lisbon

What a wonderful event, interesting and welcoming people and an absolutely unforgettable time!

I am available to teach your team mitigating digital harm as a solo facilitator or how to understand user search behavior, solo or with my colleagues at the Information Architecture Gateway. Let me know if we can help.

Read the UXLX Write-ups at Medium:

UXLX 2023 Wrap Up: Workshops

UXLX 2023 Wrap Up: Talks Day

Ethics in Computer Programming: Move Fast, and Let Someone Else Break Things

In a session yesterday of the NSF CyberAmbassadors leadership training program, my breakout group were tasked with discussing a case study of a potential ethics violation in research data privacy. The Code of Conduct that we were to use to determine if a violation occurred was the Association for Computing Machinery’s (ACM).

The case study involved a research scientist who had made software to analyze three sets of participant data, including DNA records, medical records and social media posts. There was a problem with the program and the scientist wanted to be able to do a crowdsourced code review. They asked their ERB team to review whether they could release the codebase to the public to crowdsource the problem. The ERB approved the request as long as no participant data was also released or could be reidentified. The case expressed a statement that there was a risk of reidentifying data but didn’t say specifically how. Just that the request was approved.

My first impression was that the research scientist was hiding behind item 2.6 in the ACM Code of Conduct, which says to only do work within your area of competence. The way we read it, the researcher relied on the Ethics Review Board (ERB) to make the ethical determination. Since the ERB approved the study, was the researcher in the clear?

Conversation ensued about how a data analytics program that didn’t include test data could be tested, or whether it could be tested with dummy data and a sample of open social media posts/hashtags, etc. but that was actually aside from our real interest, which was the idea that technology developers, including those with less funding, but also those with fewer guardrails, may not be competent to or interested in make ethical decisions.

Someone brought up AI. People working in AI today or really any large, complex model affecting global populations, are often making decisions way outside of their area of competence. They may do well, in one or two disciplines, but understanding and unraveling the externalities of what the thing will do once it’s in the world is of lesser interest since they aren’t ethicists.

In fact, not all companies have ERBs and many big names, you know who, have quietly and unceremoniously disbanded their ethics teams. In a world of move fast and break things, it’s not their area of competence.

Is this the world we want to live in?

UX-LX: Designing Search Experiences in Lisbon!

May 24, 2023 9:00AM-12:30PM WET
Sensemaking, Search and SEO at UX-LX: UX Lisbon

Designing Effective Search Experiences

How do people locate and discover information online? Well, they type keywords into a search engine and then select items from the search results, right? This is the current mental model of how search/retrieval works for most users. But it’s not the only way people search, nor is it necessarily the most effective for the information seeker.

In this workshop, you will learn about ”Sense-making,” a search behavior that information architects, user experience (UX) and usability pros should not ignore. You will learn how individuals (and groups) plan and carry out search activities. How a searcher’s goals affect their sense-making tasks. And how accessible design and information architectures improve search performance. At the end, you you will understand how to optimize the user experience of your products and search engine results pages, so people get the information they need with less frustration. 

Topics covered:

  • Approaches to sense-making & information seeking behavior
  • Searcher goals that affect sense-making tasks
  • How accessible design and information architecture improve search performance
  • Where & how to implement search-related sense-making in user personas/profiles & customer journeys
  • How to optimize individual search listings for findability & sense-making
  • Search strategies for apps, video, voice and ChatGPT

Exercises:

  • Individual and group search exercise
  • Analyze a selected web page for accessible design and search optimization
  • Incorporate search behavior characteristics into personas and JTBD
  • App, video and voice search optimization
  • Discussion of new and emerging forms of search experiences

Attendees will learn:

  • How to identify search behaviors and incorporate them in personas and JTBD tasks
  • How to architect & optimize different types of search experiences
  • How accessible design can improve search experiences for everyone
  • How search strategy differs for websites, apps, voice, video and emerging experiences


Any requirements for attending: None

Information Architecture Conference 2023

I am also hosting a full day workshop on Safe Tech Audit: Applying IA Heuristics for Digital Product Safety Testing in New Orleans on March 28 at IAC23: The Information Architecture Conference. Registration

Safe Tech Audit Sketchnotes – IAC22

Zsofi Lang’s Sketchnotes from my talk “Safe Tech Audit: IA as a Framework for Respectful Design” from The Information Architecture Conference 2022:

Image