SILS Student Showcase

I was nominated to present three projects at the Pratt SILS Student Showcase on May 10, 2013, including a review of technology platforms for a digital humanities skillshare application; a group project on linked open data at cultural heritage institutions in which I studied the Australian War Memorial, EU Screen and the Deutsche National Bibliotek; and a group project on folksonomies and social tagging in museums, which was presented at the 2013 Information Architecture Summit.

A Survey of Digital Humanities Skillshare Applications, nominated for the Pratt SILS Showcase:

The DH skillshare website is available here: DH Skillshare

Linked Open Data for Cultural Heritage, group project nominated for Pratt SILS Student Showcase. Poster, presentation and paper below.

LOD for CH Poster:

LOD for CH Presentation:

Paper: Linked Open Data for Cultural Heritage
By Jeff Edelstein, Lola Galla, Carolyn Li-Madeo, Julia Marden, Alison Rhonemus, Noreen Whysel
Abstract: This paper surveys the landscape of linked open data projects in cultural heritage, exam- ining the work of groups from around the world. Traditionally, linked open data has been ranked using the five star method proposed by Tim Berners-Lee. We found this ranking to be lacking when evaluating how cultural heritage groups not merely develop linked open datasets, but find ways to used linked data to augment user experience. Building on the five-star method, we developed a six-stage life cycle describing both dataset development and dataset usage. We use this framework to describe and evaluate fifteen linked open data projects in the realm of cultural heritage.

Download the paper: Linked Open Data for Cultural Heritage

Poster: Folksonomies and Social Tagging in Museums, created with Kathleen Dowling and Dana Hart and presented at the 2013 Information Architecture Summit in Baltimore on April 5. This poster was nominated for the Pratt SILS Student Showcase on May 10:

The companion presentation, Folksonomies in Museums and other recent presentations are available at Slideshare.

World IA Day: City Data

I had the chance to fill in for Andrew Nicklin, NYC Director of Research and Development at DoITT, at World IA Day on February 11, 2013. The event was held after Winter Storm Nemo hit the region. We had anticipated up to 330 attendees, but the storm knocked out commuter trains, and road conditions in New Jersey and upstate New York kept many home. Still, an unexpectedly large crowd of 130 came out to celebrate Information Architecture.

I presented an updated version of my IA for Emergency response presentation, this time focusing on the collection and dissemination of city data and community engagement and how information architects and design professionals can participate.

Information Architecture and City Data from Noreen Whysel

I am working on a collection of presentations and talk summaries that will be posted to the World IA Day website.

Archiving Digital Maps

An excerpt and presentation from an academic paper on archiving digital maps:

My research examines the historical challenges faced by a local GIS community and its advocacy for improved access and availability of geographic data on local and national levels. I was primarily interested in the data access issues that led a group of geographers in New York City to develop a centralized data repository and basemap, and examined concurrent practices at the national level. I intend to use the results of this research to inform the development of a born-digital archive of 9/11 artifacts in cooperation with members of GISMO, a New York City based GIS advocacy group.
Methods: I used qualitative research methods to evaluate the current landscape of archival practices for digital, geospatial content. I examined monographs, scholarly journal articles, conference proceedings, news articles, and website materials.
This project presents a thorough evaluation of archival practices and challenges for digital, geospatial material. My research includes a definition of geographic data, an overview of geographic data classification, geolibraries and geospatial preservation models, and challenges for the management, sharing and maintenance of geospatial collections. I concluded with actionable ideas for librarians who are developing a geographic collection.

Why I am Voting for Obama

Choice. I have two daughters who I love dearly. I worry about their future and the opportunity they have for a good life. Choice to me goes well beyond healthcare decisions. It includes the right to decide: what and where to study, what job to pursue, what items to buy, who (and whether) to marry, how to invest for retirement, pretty much everything that entails a choice.

The availability of health options is fundamental, because without good health, little else matters. I read today that a Michigan judge decided to allow an employer to withhold free contraception from his employees because of his religious beliefs. While I respect a person’s religious beliefs, no one has the right to impose them on another person. Republicans love consumer choice and abhor the Nanny State, but for some reason it is OK for one’s employer to make decisions that restrict employee choice. I don’t get how you can have it both ways.

War and Foreign Policy. If you have never been to war, please talk to someone who has and ask them how they would feel about returning to Iraq or fighting a war in Iran. Mitt Romney hasn’t served or sent any of his sons to serve in defense of our country, but he is happy to send yours. He is happy to reduce educational opportunities for disadvantaged economic classes (read, Black, Hispanic), because if you can’t borrow from your parents for your education, the Army will offer those opportunities.

Romney’s performance at the debate was absolutely frightening. He has threatened to upset our relations with China (not even going to talk about the money he made off of his China investments). He has already embarrassed himself on the world stage by insulting both the UK and bizarrely misrepresenting our relations with Russia. And after all that, he conceded during that debate that his plan is basically to do exactly what Obama did only “stronger,” whatever that means.

Obama’s guiding principle is Diplomacy first, then sanctions, then action. He means what he says and follows through strongly. Romney’s scare politics mean forget diplomacy, strengthen sanctions and get ready to hit Iran fast. Iran has shown some willingness to talk (not that I trust that at all, but…) but they are waiting to see who is president first. To me that is more frightening than all the talk about “four years closer to a bomb.”

Regarding Benghazi, Romney’s response was alarming. Even Condoleeza Rice, George W. Bush’s Secretary of State, said on Fox News that actionable intelligence is not always available early on in an incident. They were still trying to sort out what was going on when Romeny accused Obama of lying and withholding the truth. I don’t want a leader that jumps the gun on delicate international matters when lives are at stake, even, or especially, if lives have already been taken.

Economy. Unemployment is at 7.9%. 171,000 new jobs in October. Obama’s economic policies helped us avoid sinking into a Depression. It is correct for Romney to point out that people are still hurting. But the 12 million jobs Romney says he will add in the next four years is the MINIMUM expected by any economic report regardless of who is president. We had eight years of policies that decimated a healthy surplus and crashed our economy. We are supposed to go back to these same policies and trust companies who are hoarding capital to turn this around? Seriously?

On a side note, if you are worried about the price of gasoline, go to data.BLS.gov and check the CPI index for gas prices. It stands at $3.817 as of September. It’s high, but not as high as the height of the economic crisis in 2008, where it varied from $3.338 to $4.469 before the election then fell to $2.637 by December. Not that a president can do much to affect prices, as it tends to follow international economic trends and also can vary a lot locally, with the highest prices, curiously, in Red States. (Gas is about $3.50 in NYC today, $3.55 nationally, despite the hit by Hurricane Sandy.)

Federal Aid. Many of you know that I am very interested in emergency management through my work with the NYC Office of Emergency Management. I have very personal experience with major disasters that require national and international assistance. I breathed the dust of 9/11 and witnessed the outpouring of response to that tragedy from all corners of the world. Recently, I’ve seen and welcomed the support post-Sandy from FEMA, the National Guard and Reserves and I just can’t fathom what we would do without coordinated aid. Romney wants to get rid of FEMA and other Federal aid and let states fix their own problems. Have you seen the pictures of New Jersey? Is New Jersey supposed to fix it themselves? Do we really think the devastation in New York City and Long Island isn’t going to have an effect nationally? Governor Christie hasn’t been lumping praise on Obama for nothing.

In sum, I am worried about our country’s future. I trust the man who has two daughters and cares, as I do about creating a future that will be best for our children. A future of choice, community and responsibility.

Press Mentions: Marketing Land: Redesigning Or Creating A Website? Here’s Why Information Architecture Should Be Priority #1

From “Redesigning Or Creating A Website? Here’s Why Information Architecture Should Be Priority #1: Columnist Shari Thurow explains information architecture, site navigation, and how they relate to one another.” Shari Thurow on February 13, 2015 at 10:37 am
http://marketingland.com/redesigning-creating-website-plan-information-architecture-117040?utm_campaign=feed-main&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner

Of course, I am not saying to ignore the aesthetics of navigation design. Nor am I saying to ignore the user experience. What I am saying is to have a strong foundation that makes sense and is meaningful to users.

I think my colleague, Noreen Whysel, Community Manager for the OWASP Foundation, Operations Advisor for the Information Architecture Institute, and independent researcher, summarizes this well:

“Information architecture is getting people to the information they need quickly, easily and without a lot of hassle. It’s sort of like a good road map. But it doesn’t mean leaving out the scenic overlooks. I’m a big fan of brown highway signs and serendipity. Sometimes you need a big picture view or a detour to get a new perspective on what you are looking for.”

Amen to that, Noreen.

GeoSprocket Live Survey on GIS Tools

The first round of results of a recent GIS user poll from GeoSprocket, asking about GIS tool used and frequency of use, are available:

Bill Morris surveyed GIS users via several feeds including a Vermont GIS listserv, ESRI and O’Reilly conference hashtags and the author’s social media accounts. An interesting survey, but difficult to get a good read on who the sample represents. Not knowing how many people follow a specific Twitter hashtag, it is difficult to measure how many of the respondents might have found the survey via the ESRI versus the O’Reilly hashtag.

With those caveats, let’s look at the numbers.

In the first release, 55% of the respondents are primary ESRI users, 24% use open source GIS tools, 16% are Google Map users and 8% use some other tool, including FME, MicroStation, ENVI/IDL, GIS Cloud, AutoDesk, Maptitude, Idrisi, Mapserver, Geocortex and others. Bill noted surprise at how many Google users there are. Frankly, I would have thought there would be more, but perhaps Bill’s social network skews toward ESRI or that more people follow the ESRI hashtag than the O’Reilly one.

Overlap in product use is what I find most interesting about this survey.  It seems a larger proportion of people who use non-ESRI tools like Google Maps or open source products also use ESRI tools (80% versus 40%). However, 75% of ESRI users also use Google Maps. This  indicates that there is value for a lot of people in using a mixed approach.

The second round of Bill’s survey remains open and live results indicate that there are indeed more Google users than the first round suggested. As of today, ESRI users remain the majority with 48% of users versus 30% Google Maps. The other categories are relatively the same.

It will be interesting to see how these numbers change as more people enter the survey.

It would also be more interesting and indeed useful to see why certain tools are used over others as opposed to simply which tools were used. Clearly with up to 80% overlap of use there must be reasons why certain tools are chosen for certain tasks. Hopefully, Bill will add that question in a subsequent survey.